MIAMI-DADE’S “TRANSSEXUAL” ORDINANCE: LEGALIZES DISCRIMINATION

THE FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE IS AGAINST LEGALIZING DISCRIMINATION


 What’s Wrong With Miami-Dade’s Proposed Discriminatory “Transsexual/Transgender” Ordinance?

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

Q: DOES THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE ACTUALLY LEGALIZE DISCRIMINATION?

A: YES! This proposed “Transsexual” ordinance legalizes discrimination, pure and simple! So far, at least thirty-six (36) reported cases of discrimination have been documented as a direct result of these unjust laws. Truly, they are modern-day Jim Crow laws. The proposed ordinance unjustly discriminates, marginalizes, and penalizes everyone wishing to protect their children and families from the sexual behavioral choices and practices of an individual with sexual identity issues or who is in denial of his/her sex. County ordinances must be based on clear, factual, objective legal concepts and standards, not on ambiguous, capricious propaganda terms, subjective allegations, arbitrary claims, or personal feelings. Nor should ordinances be used to promote an ideological agenda.

Q: IS THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE BASED ON FACTS?

A: NO! This proposed discriminatory “Transsexual” ordinance is based on lies, distortions and manipulations of facts. The proposed ordinance’s arguments are completely bogus. For example, ordinance promoters allege that so-called “transsexual” discrimination is “pervasive” and “serious”, yet they could not name a single company or government entity that discriminates against this so-called “category.” Furthermore, according to a Special Investigative Report prepared last year by the U.S. Hispanic Publishers Federation, not a single discrimination complaint has ever been filed in Florida with the exception of Broward County where six “gender identity or expression” complaints were filed and not a single one was found to be valid.

Q: WHAT EXACTLY ARE ‘SEXUAL IDENTITY’ AND ‘SEXUAL EXPRESSION’?

A: “Sexual Identity” and “Sexual Expression” are discriminatory ideological propaganda terms, i.e., terms specifically used to advance an extremist ideology. According to scientists, so-called “sexual identity” and “sexual expression” are arbitrary and highly fluid terms based on “personal feeling” and the subjective perception of one’s sex. The American Psychological Association (APA) defines “gender identity or expression” as an individual’s sense of being male, female, something other, or something in-between. As such, these terms are purposefully arbitrary and scientifically undefinable. This invariably produces confusion, discrimination, and litigation. Commissioners owe it to their constituents to reject the proposed ordinance as arbitrary, discriminatory, ideologically-based, and legally, as well as ethically, deficient.

Q: ARE ‘SEXUAL IDENTITY’ AND ‘SEXUAL EXPRESSION’ SCIENTIFICALLY DEMONSTRABLE OR OBJECTIVELY DEFINABLE TERMS?

A: NO! Neither “sexual identity” nor “sexual expression” are scientifically demonstrable, genetically provable, nor objectively definable biological realities. To amend Miami-Dade’s Anti-Discrimination ordinance to include a freely chosen, arbitrarily created “category” that is not scientifically demonstrable, genetically provable, or objectively definable is discriminatory, unjust and against the public interest. Because this proposed ordinance does not adequately define the controversial ideological terms “sexual identity” and “sexual expression,” it is patently unjust to subject Miami-Dade residents to this ambiguous, capricious, and discriminatory ordinance.

Q: DOES THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADDRESS A LEGITIMATE COUNTY CONCERN?

A: NO! Far from it. The Miami-Dade County Commission and its committees are obligated to address public health, safety, and welfare concerns. So-called “transsexualism/transgenderism” is not one of them. Absent a concrete showing that the alleged “problem” this discriminatory, ideologically-based ordinance purports to solve is real and widespread, Miami-Dade Commissioners should not waste any of their valuable time and resources on this clearly ideological non-issue.

Q: DOES THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE EXPOSE BUSINESSES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND PEOPLE TO FRIVOLOUS LITIGATION OR PROSECUTION?

A: YES! Absolutely! Businesses, organizations and individual residents could unknowingly commit and be unjustly prosecuted for violations of the proposed ordinance for protecting privacy rights or not building or providing so-called “gender neutral” facilities. For example, if they do not allow men claiming to be women use women’s bathrooms, locker rooms, showers and/or dressing rooms. It has already happened in other parts of the country. Lacking clear boundaries and precise definitions and terms, anyone can unknowingly commit an offense under this ideologically-based proposed ordinance, and be unjustly investigated or sued and dragged into court.

Q: SHOULD ANYONE BE FORCED TO ACCEPT AS TRUE WHAT DNA AND BIOLOGY PROVES IS FALSE?

A: NO! No one should be forced to accept as true what DNA and biology proves is false. An individual can freely chose to believe or behave in whatever sexual role he or she chooses, but they have no right to force everyone else to accept or approve their freely chosen sexual behavioral choice, or so-called “sexual identity or expression.” Especially when this sexual behavioral choice or so-called “sexual identity or expression” is directly contradicted by biology, their chromosomes, and their DNA!

Q: DOES ANYONE HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEMAND LEGAL BENEFITS, PRIVILEGES OR PROTECTIONS BASED ON WHATEVER THEY ALLEGE IS THEIR FREELY CHOSEN “SEXUAL IDENTITY” OR “EXPRESSION”?

A: NO! No one has the right to demand legal benefits, privileges or protections based on whatever they allege is their freely and voluntarily chosen so-called “sexual identity or expression.” An individual’s sex is not a “flavor-of-the-day” thing. Sex is a readily knowable, scientifically demonstrable, biologically-provable reality. Objectively speaking, an individual’s sex is a precisely determinable genetic fact that is not up to them to decide. As a scientifically demonstrable biological reality, sex is not based on an arbitrary whim, personal feeling, capricious belief, or private fantasy. Like it or not, sex, like age, race or color, can never be changed. While an individual’s physical appearance can be cosmetically modified, their DNA or chromosomes can never be altered.

Q: DOES THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE ALLOW INDIVIDUALS TO USE WHATEVER BATHROOMS, DRESSING ROOMS, SHOWERS, OR OTHER SEX-SPECIFIC PUBLIC FACILITIES THEY WISH?

A: YES! The discriminatory “transsexual” ordinance irresponsibly allows individuals with sexual identity issues or in denial or rejection of their sex, to use whatever bathrooms, dressing rooms, showers, and other sex-specific public facilities they wish. Authorizing individuals with sexual identity issues the use whatever bathrooms, dressing rooms, showers, and other sex-specific public facilities they wish to use, violates constitutional privacy rights and legalizes discrimination against Miami-Dade County residents and their families. This proposed ordinance has nothing to do with sexual equality and everything to do with legalized discrimination!

Q: WILL THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE INCREASE HEALTH CARE COSTS AND OTHER BURDENS FOR MIAMI-DADE RESIDENTS?

A: YES! This proposed “Transsexual” ordinance leaves the door wide open for individuals to file alleged discrimination lawsuits if health care dollars are not spent on costly, non-medically required sex reassignment and sex reversal surgeries which average $50,000 per person. It is unwarranted and unjust to force Miami-Dade taxpayers and the public health system to pay for these elective, non-medically required surgeries.

Q: IS IT TRUE A “TRANSSEXUAL” HAS NOWHERE TO FILE AN ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT?

A: FALSE. Under the Fair Housing Act, the EEOC and HUD accept “gender identity or expression” discrimination complaints. Furthermore, because EEOC and HUD regulations do not cover public accommodations, this discriminatory ordinance would legalize the violation of privacy and safety when a male claiming he is female, enters bathrooms, locker rooms, showers, and dressing rooms of the opposite sex as has already been thoroughly documented. In fact, in 2007, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver in Etsitty vs. Utah Transit Authority ruled that a male bus driver could not use female facilities while on his bus route because it could expose his employer to liability claims.


 Aberro fumando

“’Sex change’ is biologically impossible. People who undergo sex-reassignment surgery do not change from men to women or vice versa. Rather, they become feminized men or masculinized women. Claiming that this is civil-rights matter and encouraging surgical intervention is in reality to collaborate with and promote a mental disorder.” – Dr. Paul R. McHugh, former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry.


For interviews, comments, or to belong, please contact us at:
FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
POB 350751 / Jose Marti Station / Miami, FL 33135
DemocraticLeague@aol.com

Meet Us on the Internet
floridademocraticleague.wordpress.com

Like the FDL on Facebook
www.facebook.com/floridademocraticleague

Copyright © 2014 FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE, Inc.

THE ASSAULT ON DEMOCRACY CONTINUES…

<> VERSIÓN EN ESPAÑOL AL FINAL

Jusges Zabel and Garcia trade their black judge's robe for a white KKK robe.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE. Thank you. Tuesday, October 7, 2014.
CONTACT: Sara Espinoza, 786/286-8787 DemocraticLeague@aol.com

Judicial Voter Lynchings Ok’d by U.S. Supreme Court

<< Without a Pro Rule-of-Law Majority on the Court to Stop Them, Outlaw Federal Judges Now Have License to Deny Americans their Basic Constitutional Rights! >>

MIAMI, FL – This Monday, October 6th, the U.S. Supreme Court’s refused to accept appeals from the citizens in the states of Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin where outlaw federal judges illegally overthrew their state constitutions and egregiously denied them their constitutional right to vote.

The Florida Democratic League (FDL), one of our state’s leading minority-led Democratic voters’ civil rights and social justice advocacy organizations, issues the following urgent statement:

“Lacking a majority of justices respectful of the Rule of Law and democratic values, this Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court refused the appeal of the citizens in five states where outlaw federal judges overthrew their state constitutions and denied them their basic constitutional rights. Thus, the Supreme Court is now an accomplice to the judicial lynching of voters in these states and has violated its own ruling in last year’s U.S. vs Windsor case which affirmed that Marriage is not a constitutional right but rather a public policy issue states have the historic right to decide.

For the time being, the Supreme Court’s refusal to uphold the Rule of Law deprives of their basic rights only the people in the five now-captive states that had appealed. The Court’s refusal does not yet legally affect the rights of the people of Florida where anti-democracy, anti-voter rights aberrosexualist extremists continue to relentlessly seek to overthrow Florida’s voter-approved constitutional respect for Marriage as the union of husband and wife and FDL continues to successfully defeat these extremists.

While corrupt judges in Monroe, Miami-Dade, Broward and Leon County have illegally ruled to overthrow Florida’s voter-approved constitutional respect for Marriage and to deny voters their rights, extremists have not been able to sell a single aberrosexual so-called “marriage” license in the Sunshine State.

FDL, along with all Floridians, applauds Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi and Governor Rick Scott for continuing to honor their oath of office to defend the Florida Constitution and the rights of ALL Florida voters. Our state’s marriage laws remain in effect and the judges that have violated the Constitution and denied Floridians their voter rights should be removed from office and disbarred as soon as possible.

-30-

For more information or an interview,
please contact the Sara Espinoza at (786) 286-8787 or DemocraticLeague@aol.com

About the FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE (FDL)

Founded in 1991, the Florida Democratic League (FDL) is today our state’s leading minority-led civil rights and social justice advocacy organization. The FDL’s grassroots campaigns effectively raise issues of importance to all Floridians, especially minorities. As one of Florida’s most respected Democratic voters’ organizations, FDL is at the vanguard of local and statewide engagement to solve the most challenging problems of our time. FDL proudly reaffirms its commitment to respect for innocent human life, social justice and human development, freedom through the Rule of Law, and an end to hatred, ignorance and intolerance. For more information about FDL, please visit our Internet website: floridademocraticleague.wordpress.com


 COMUNICADO DE PRENSA

CON EL RUEGO DE SU AMABLE PUBLICACION. ¡Gracias!
MARTES, 7 de octubre de 2014.
CONTACTO: Sara Espinoza, 786/286-8787 DemocraticLeague@aol.com

Autoriza Corte Suprema de EE.UU. los linchamientos judiciales de votantes

<< Sin una mayoría pro-Estado de Derecho en el Tribunal para detenerlos, ¡jueces federales delincuentes ahora tienen luz verde para negarles a los norteamericanos sus derechos constitucionales básicos! >>

MIAMI, FL – El lunes, 6 de octubre, la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos se negó a aceptar la apelación de los ciudadanos en los estados de Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia y Wisconsin, donde jueces federales delincuentes derrocaron ilegalmente las constituciones estatales e injustamente le negaron a todos los ciudadanos el derecho constitucional al voto.

En respuesta, la Liga Demócrata de la Florida (LDF), principal organización en nuestro estado de votantes demócratas y dirigida por minorías, defensora de derechos civiles y la justicia social, emite la siguiente declaración urgente:

“Por falta de una mayoría de jueces respetuosos del Estado de Derecho y los principios democráticos, este lunes, la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos rechazó la apelación de los ciudadanos en cinco estados en los que jueces federales delincuentes derrocaron a sus constituciones estatales y les negaron sus derechos constitucionales básicos. Así, la Corte Suprema es ahora cómplice del linchamiento judicial de los votantes en estos estados y ha violado su propia decisión en el caso U.S. vs Windsor del año pasado, donde afirmó que el matrimonio no es un derecho constitucional, sino más bien un tema de política pública que los estados tienen el derecho histórico a decidir.

Por el momento, la negativa de la Corte Suprema a defender el Estado de Derecho priva de sus derechos básicos sólo los ciudadanos en los cinco estados cautivos que habían apelado. La negativa del Tribunal aun no afecta legalmente los derechos de los residentes de la Florida, donde extremistas aberrosexualistas anti-democracia y anti-derechos de votantes siguen buscando, sin descanso, derrocar el respeto constitucional aprobada por los votantes de la Florida para el matrimonio como la unión de marido y mujer y donde la LDF continúa impidiendo con éxito el objetivo de estos extremistas.

Si bien jueces corruptos en los condados de Monroe, Miami-Dade, Broward y Leon ilegalmente han decretado el derrocamiento del respeto constitucional al Matrimonio aprobado por los votantes de la Florida y le han negado a los votantes sus derechos, los extremistas no han podido vender ni una sola licencia “matrimonial” aberrosexual en este estado.

La LDF, junto con todos los floridanos, aplaude a la Procuradora General de la Florida Pam Bondi y el gobernador Rick Scott por cumplir con su juramento de defender la Constitución de la Florida y los derechos de todos los votantes. Las leyes protegiendo el matrimonio de nuestro estado se mantienen vigentes y los jueces que han violado la constitución y atacado los derechos de los votantes floridanos deben ser removidos de sus cargos y expulsados del Colegio de Abogados tan pronto sea posible”.

-30-

Para más información o una entrevista,
por favor contacte a Sara Espinoza al (786) 286-8787 o
DemocraticLeague@aol.com

Acerca de la LIGA DEMOCRATA DE LA FLORIDA (LDF)

Fundada en 1991, la Liga Demócrata de la Florida (LDF) es hoy la organización más importante de defensa de derechos civiles y justicia social dirigida por minorías en nuestro estado. Las campañas populares de la LDF plantean eficazmente cuestiones de importancia a todos los floridanos, especialmente las minorías. Como una de las organización de votantes demócratas más respetadas de la Florida, la LDF está en la vanguardia del compromiso local y estatal por resolver los problemas más desafiantes de nuestro tiempo. La LDF reafirma orgullosamente su compromiso con el respeto por la vida humana inocente, la justicia social y el desarrollo humano, la libertad a través del Estado de Derecho y el fin del odio, la ignorancia y la intolerancia. Para obtener más información sobre la LDF, por favor visite nuestro sitio de Internet: floridademocraticleague.wordpress.com

ABERROSEXUAL ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS LEGALIZE DISCRIMINATION

Aberrosexualist Judge Refuses to Marry Normal Couples, but Don’t You Try It

Marriage Equality Definition

By Gary DeMar

You’ve read stories about business owners that will not serve aberrosexuals when it comes to providing services for so-called “weddings.” Bakeries, a photographer, a florist, and others have been sanctioned by the government because they would not participate in the charade of aberrosexual so-called “marriage.”

A bakery owner in Oregon broke down in tears while discussing the fallout of her and her husband’s decision not to bake a wedding cake for two aberrosexuals on the basis of their Christian beliefs.

An Oregon couple has had to close their business because the state has made it impossible for them to do business because they will not serve aberrosexuals who want to so-called “marry.”

You’ve read stories about business owners that will not serve aberrosexuals when it comes to providing services for so-called “weddings.” Bakeries, a photographer, a florist, and others have been sanctioned by the government because they would not participate in the charade of aberrosexual so-called “marriage.”

“Earlier this year, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries found ‘substantial evidence’ that Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa, discriminated against the aberrosexuals.

“Oregon bakery owners face a $150,000 discrimination fine for not baking a wedding cake for aberrosexuals.”

From this story we are learning that business owners are not permitted to refuse service to people with whom they disagree on sexual behavioral choices.

Are we to believe that a Muslim food shop that only sells Halal meats should be forced to sell pork?

Should restaurants be forced to sell Halal meats because Muslims are offended by non-Halal eateries in their neighborhood?

Should a black print shop be forced to print fliers for a KKK rally?

These are all common sense questions that demand a common sense answer. No.

But when it comes to anything aberrosexual, the rules change thanks to highly discriminatory aberrosexual anti-discrimination laws. Under these unjust laws, people must comply or face severe financial hardship at the discretion of the government.

It is forbidden to discriminate against aberrosexuals who want to so-call “marry,” but it is perfectly legal for an aberrosexual to discriminate against normal couples:

“Catholic priests have refused to marry aberrosexuals for years. Now a Texas judge has an answer to that, saying she will not marry normal couples until aberrosexuals so-called “marriage” is legal in the state.

“Judge Tonya Parker of Dallas County told the Dallas Voice that she respectfully tells couples why she can’t conduct their marriage ceremony:

“‘I’m sorry. I don’t perform marriage ceremonies because we are in a state that does not have aberrosexual so-called “marriage,” and until it does, I am not going to partially apply the law to one group of people that doesn’t apply to another group of people.’

“The Lone Star state judge also points out that she is not required by law to perform marriages, as it was considered a ‘discretionary function’ that is not to interfere with ‘mandatory judicial duties.’”

The double standard is duly noted.

Judge Tonya Parker understands the double standard she is promoting, so she offers the legal caveat “that she is not required by law to perform marriages.” She knows she can get away with this hypocrisy because people opposed to aberrosexuals so-called “marriage” would not want to pass a law that compelled her to marry anybody.

The problem is that there shouldn’t be a law forcing businesses to act contrary to their personal beliefs. Everybody should have this freedom.

Oregon and other states have passed discriminatory and unjust so-called “anti-discrimination laws,” and that’s where the tyranny resides.

Do I object that this aberrosexualist judge refuses to perform marriages because of her ideological bias? Not at all. There are plenty of judges that will perform marriages.

The same should be true for aberrosexuals looking for vendors to service aberrosexual so-called “weddings.” If you don’t find what you like in one business, then take your business elsewhere. People discriminate in their buying and selling decisions all the time for any number of reasons, and they are not penalized for it.

A business should go out of business because people decide not to do business with the business; it’s none of the government’s business who a business does or does not do business with.

Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/17429/gay-judge-will-marry-heterosexual-couples-dont-try/#6RZrAqqxC0rC5gCj.99

SUPPORT TRUE MARRIAGE EQUALITY!

Marriage Equality Definition

As our state’s largest minority-led Democratic voters’ human and civil rights organization, the Florida Democratic League is a battle-proven champion in the fight for Marriage Equality. But Marriage Equality does not equal the fiction of homosexual so-called “marriage.”

True Marriage Equality equals affording all Floridians the same, equal right to marry under the same, equal rules as everyone else. Everyone in Florida already enjoys FULL Marriage Equality! To say otherwise, is one big lie.

OPPOSING DISCRIMINATION AND VOTER LYNCHINGS

Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Sarah Zabel Did in Her Black Robe What Ku Klux Klansmen of Old Did in their White Robes.Jusges Zabel and Garcia trade their black judge's robe for a white KKK robe.

BIGOTRY AND DISCRIMINATION HAVE NO PLACE IN FLORIDA!

We at the Florida Democratic League (FDL) don’t back down when it comes to discrimination – and neither do you.

Help support the Florida Democratic League as we fight discrimination and promote equality for all Floridians. Your donation today is a much-needed source of funding to promote efforts such as educating members and supporters about sound public policy issues and holding your elected officials –judges included– accountable for their actions.

Turn your spare change into real change! Donate to the Florida Democratic League using a check or money order.

Please make and mail your check or your money order to:
FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
POB 350751
Jose Marti Station
Miami, FL 33135

THANK YOU for helping! We applaud and appreciate your generosity.

<< Donors to the Florida Democratic League are happy to know they are donating to an organization that fully supports the Donor Bill of Rights. >>


For interviews, comments, or to belong, please contact us at:
FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
POB 350751 / Jose Marti Station / Miami, FL 33135
DemocraticLeague@aol.com

Meet Us on the Internet
floridademocraticleague.wordpress.com

Like the FDL on Facebook
www.facebook.com/floridademocraticleague

Copyright © 2014 FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE, Inc.

 

OPPOSE BIGOTRY AND HATE!

THE FAMILY IS UNDER ATTACK!
Marriage Under AttackWe must protect the Family. Ideology shouldn’t be an excuse for bigotry and hate against the Family. Since when is engaging in unhealthy, biologically aberrant sexual conduct a “right”? Under what Constitution? In what Bill of Rights? According to what International Treaty? The truth is that these off-the-wall, so-called “LGBT rights” simply do not exist! Anywhere! Except in the barren, infertile imagination of aberrosexualist extremists. Truly, the emperor has no clothes!