OPPOSING JUDICIAL CORRUPTION AND VOTER SUPPRESSION

Civil and Human Rights Leaders Condemn Racist, Anti-Voter Rights Ruling
<<< Miami-Dade judge denies Florida voters their rights, their equality, their dignity, and their day in court! >>>

Layout 1

MIAMI, FL – Last Friday, July 25, 2014, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Sarah Zabel indefensibly granted a motion for Summary Judgment filed by anti-voter rights extremists in a seditious lawsuit to overthrow Florida’s Constitution and deny Florida citizens basic voter rights. Zabel’s hateful, incendiary decision is a modern-day judicial lynching of the millions of Hispanic and African-American voters who in 2008 overwhelmingly approved Florida’s constitutional respect for the institution of Marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

By granting the extremists’ Summary Judgment motion, Zabel not only denied Florida citizens a trial in this case, she also violated their voter rights and 14th amendment guarantee to equal protection and due process.

Her decision is nothing short of a racist violation of constitutional due process and equal protection rights. Zabel is apparently so ignorant of constitutional law that she simply cannot grasp the enormity of the injustice and discrimination she is committing,” stated Nathaniel Wilcox, executive director of People United to Lead the Struggle for Equality (PULSE), one of Miami-Dade’s oldest civil rights organizations.

By denying minorities their basic rights, Zabel has effectively disenfranchised and harmed African-American and Hispanic citizens whose voter rights have been historically denied. CNN exit poll during the historic 2008 elections show that African-American and Hispanic voters were more likely to support the Florida Marriage Protection Amendment, 72% and 64% respectively, than the general voting population, 62%,” points out Anthony Verdugo, executive director of the Christian Family Coalition Florida, a state-wide human rights and social justice advocacy organization.

Millions of Americans have selflessly shed their blood in battlefields throughout the world to secure the constitutional rights Zabel has violated in this case. As if that were not enough, she has violated her Oath of Office and the Code Judicial Conduct. Her racist ruling diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and does irreparable harm to the system of government under law,” adds Dr. Eladio Jose Armesto, chairman of the Florida Democratic League, the state’s largest Hispanic-led Democratic voters’ organization.

WHY IS ZABEL’S DECISION UNJUST AND DISCRIMINATORY?

<> Zabel’s granting of extremists’ Summary Judgment motion is unjust and discriminatory because it denies the people of Florida the basic right to a trial requiring all the false claims and allegations made in Plaintiffs lawsuit be proven.

<> Zabel’s decision is unjust and discriminatory because it disenfranchises the nearly 8 million Florida citizens who exercised their constitutional right to vote in the historic 2008 elections, in which the institution of Marriage as the union of one man and one woman was overwhelming approved by 62 percent of Florida voters.

Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/gaysouthflorida/2014/06/judge-conservative-groups-cannot-become-co-defendants-in-miami-dade-gay-marriage-lawsuit.html#storylink=cpy

<> Zabel’s decision is unjust and discriminatory because it is in criminal contempt of the legally binding U.S. Supreme Court precedent in U.S. vs. Windsor as well as the constitutional provision establishing separation of powers.

<> Zabel’s decision is unjust and discriminatory because it trashes the votes of all the nearly 8 million citizens who voted on the Florida Marriage Protection Amendment in 2008. These citizens exercised their right to vote with the full expectation that their vote would be respected, not trashed six years later by a corrupt, incompetent judge.

<> Zabel’s decision is unjust and discriminatory because it is based on Zabel’s own personal ideological bias and racially-suspect prejudices. Zabel was elected to uphold the Constitution and respect Florida law, not arbitrarily and capriciously impose her biases and prejudices on the people whose rights she swore to protect.

<> Zabel’s decision is unjust and discriminatory because it corruptly denies all Florida voters the 14th Amendment due process and equal protection rights.

<> Zabel’s decision is unjust and discriminatory because it unlawfully places Plaintiffs’ above Florida’s Constitution and Laws. Every Floridian, regardless of their alleged sexual behavioral choices or preferences, must be subject to the same constitutional mandates, the same laws, and the same rules and regulations. Zabel’s decision unlawfully carved out an exemption for Plaintiffs.

<> Zabel’s decision is unjust and discriminatory because it unlawfully exempts Plaintiffs from compliance with the laws every other Floridian must obey to change public policy issues with which they don’t agree.

In all, regardless whether the public policy issue is the fiction of same-sex so-called “marriage” or any other issue, ruling to overturn a constitutionally-sanctioned election is a direct and irreversible violation of the voter rights and constitutional liberties of citizens of a free and democratic society. In America, no one is above the law; no individual is better than another, nor does any individual have a greater claim to rights than others. Zabel must resign from the bench, or be removed by Florida’s Judicial Qualifications Commission and be disbarred by the Florida Bar.


For interviews, comments, or to belong, please contact us at:
FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
POB 350751 / Jose Marti Station / Miami, FL 33135
DemocraticLeague@aol.com

Meet Us on the Internet
floridademocraticleague.wordpress.com

Like the FDL on Facebook
www.facebook.com/floridademocraticleague

Copyright © 2014 FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE, Inc.
Advertisements

EXTREMISTS’ WAR ON TRUTH – WHAT IS UNJUST DISCRIMINATION?

Here’s an article you may want to share with others:

WHAT IS UNJUST DISCRIMINATION?

What’s fair, just, or rational about treating two same-sex individuals as if they were somehow an opposite-sex couple?

By Dr. Judy Meissner

Truth, not lies

Unjust or unlawful discrimination is treating unequally that which is equal. It occurs when some are allowed or forbidden to do what others, under the same, equal circumstances and conditions, are allowed or forbidden to do.

What is fair, just, or rational about giving two individuals of the same sex the marital rights given to an opposite-sex couple? Nothing, of course, since two men or two women do not equal one man and one woman.

Because two men or two women will never equal or be the same as an opposite-sex couple, it can never be unjust, unlawful, or irrational to treat them differently. Indeed, it would be unjust and irrational to treat them the same! And for anyone to say otherwise speaks badly of their mental sanity.

No matter how you slice it, the extremists pushing the ideological fiction –some would say fraud- of so-called “Marriage Equality” have to own up to the fact that two men or two women do not equal an opposite-sex couple; they do not complement each other, they do not possess the same “equipment,” nor can they interact the same way. These extremists must admit that two men or two women cannot engage in sexual intercourse, cannot consummate a marriage, cannot start a family, and cannot, consequently, assure society a future.

Therefore, allowing only opposite sex couples to marry does not discriminate against same-sex individuals nor does it violate their 14th Amendment’s due process and equal protection rights. To say otherwise is not only patently false; it’s exquisitely absurd, insane and irrational.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Celebrate-Your-Orthosexuality-Celebra-tu-Ortosexualidad/558848640834959

DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION, VOTER RIGHTS AND THE RULE OF LAW IN FLORIDA

OPEN LETTER TO JUDGE SARAH ZABEL REGARDING THE ANTI-VOTER RIGHTS, ANTI-CONSTITUTION SHAM LAWSUIT

July 4th, 2014

Hon. Judge Sarah I. Zabel
Miami-Dade Circuit Court
Miami, Florida

Re: Dismissal of Catherine Pareto, et al., vs. Harvey Ruvin
Case No. 2014-1661-CA-01

Dear Judge Zabel:

On November 4th, 2008, a historic election gave our nation its first African-American president and Florida voters overwhelmingly enhanced our state’s Constitution by reaffirming the timeless institution of Marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Six years later, those who lost the historic 2008 election, now want you to unlawfully give them what they couldn’t lawfully get at the ballot box. Plaintiffs in the above case are asking you to overthrow Florida’s Constitution; to transgress the separation of powers doctrine; to usurp the function and role of the State legislature. In essence, under the ruse of vindicating a behavioral choice they arbitrarily and unilaterally label a “right”, Plaintiffs shamelessly ask you to violate your Oath of Office and undermine the Rule of Law!

FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION

Respect for Constitutional Democracy and the Rule of Law requires an incendiary, sham lawsuit as this one be immediately dismissed sua sponte or, in the alternative, be resoundingly rejected. You have the power to involuntarily dismiss this action sua sponte on numerous grounds, including want of jurisdiction or prosecution; failure to comply with Florida Rules of Civil Procedure or to state a proper cause of action.

In light of last year’s U.S. vs Windsor Supreme Court ruling that Marriage is a public policy issue States have the right to decide, Plaintiffs’ claim to a constitutional so-called “right” to the ideological fiction of same-sex so-called “marriage” is untenable and fails as a proper cause of action.

In a nation of laws, no one can be above the law. What law gives Plaintiffs the right to arbitrarily, unilaterally, and capriciously declare a personal behavioral choice, be it sexual or otherwise, a constitutional “right,” and then file a sham lawsuit asking you to force the rest of society to accept it as such? Couldn’t Plaintiffs be more contemptuous of the law and disrespectful of your honor?

Moreover, since the Court in U.S. vs Windsor ruled that same-sex so-called “marriage is not an issue of constitutional law, doesn’t the Tenth Amendment to our Bill of Rights provide that powers not granted to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited to the States, are reserved to the States or the people? Isn’t this the power the people exercised in the historic 2008 elections?

POLITICAL QUESTION

Because the present lawsuit also presents a non-justiciable political question, shouldn’t it be involuntarily dismissed under the well-recognized Political Question doctrine which holds that courts should not rule on questions the U.S. Constitution makes the sole responsibility of another branch of government or that the U.S. Supreme Court has held courts should not hear? When the Constitution makes clear the intention that the judiciary not resolve a particular question of constitutional interpretation, shouldn’t judges respect that determination?

The Political Question doctrine also applies when, as in the present case, there is a lack of judicially manageable standards to decide the case on the merits, when judicial intervention might show insufficient respect for other branches of government, in this case the State Legislature, or when a judicial decision would cast a shadow on the integrity of the judicial branch, in this case your impartiality on this public policy issue. Marriage, being clearly a political question, was put to a vote of the people in the historic 2008 elections. Plaintiffs and their groups campaigned aggressively and freely exercised their right to vote in that election, the results of which they never contested. What makes Plaintiffs think that six years later and with unclean hands, a judge should overturn an election they participated in and never contested? How can Plaintiff have the audacity to want to get via a court order what they failed to get democratically at the ballot box?

AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DENIAL OF RIGHTS

Under American Law, courts can also dismiss non-justiciable cases, such as Plaintiffs’, that exceed the limits of a court’s judicial authority; cases where a court cannot offer a final determination or an adequate resolution. Granting the relief sought by Plaintiffs requires unlawfully overturning a constitutionally-sanctioned election on a question the U.S. Supreme Court has clearly declared a public policy issue States have the right to decide. Were you to overturn the historic 2008 elections, you would, in effect, be unconstitutionally denying Florida voters their due process, equal protection rights as well as their fundamental right to amend the State Constitution and have their vote respected.

The integrity of the judicial branch requires you to act impartially; to respect, protect and uphold the Constitution as well as the due process, equal protection and voter rights of the people of Florida. Countless Americans have died in battlefields around the world to secure the very rights this sham lawsuit attacks and defiles. Indeed, this lawsuit commits legal violence against the basic rights and freedoms for which so many Americans have fought for and shed their blood.

Regardless of whether the public policy issue is the ideological fiction of same-sex so-called “marriage” or any other issue, overturning a constitutionally-sanctioned election is an outrageous, egregious and irreversible denial of the constitutional liberties and voter rights of citizens in a free and democratic society.

NO CITIZEN IS ABOVE THE LAW

As a law-abiding judge, don’t you have the duty to reaffirm the principle that no citizen or group of citizens is above the law? That Plaintiffs do not have a greater claim to rights than everyone else? That Plaintiffs’ claim to due process and equal protection does not trump everyone else’s due process and equal protection rights?

Regardless of their alleged sexual behavioral choices, must not Plaintiffs equally submit, as everyone else, to the same equal laws and regulations? If Plaintiffs disagree with a public policy sanctioned by Florida’s Constitution and laws and want to change this policy, shouldn’t they be subject to the same equal laws as everyone else? Shouldn’t they have to change public policy by persuading our legislators to adopt new legislation or place the issue on the ballot, or by gathering the required number of signatures and letting Florida voters decide in a democratic election?

Do Plaintiffs have the right to change public policy by filing sham lawsuits or engaging in judicial sleights of hand? Wouldn’t granting Plaintiffs demands unjustly place them above the law? In a country of laws, can a judge discriminatorily carve out, for Plaintiffs’ selfish benefit and interests, the unjust and illegal exemption that Plaintiffs demand?

SHAM DISCRIMINATION ALLEGATION

Plaintiffs allege that Florida’s Constitution and laws violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because these laws do not recognize non one man/one woman unions, be they same-sex; underaged or with minors; consanguineous or with blood relatives; zoophilous or with animals; or polygamous or with multiple partners.

Nevertheless, everyone in Florida enjoys the same, equal right to get married under the same, equal terms and conditions. It is completely false to allege that Florida law violates the Fourteenth Amendment as the same, equal criterion applies equally the same to everyone. Unlike anti-interracial marriage laws that barred different races from marrying each other, modern Florida law does not discriminate against anyone. All citizens are granted the same, equal right to marry, regardless of their race, color, creed, ethnicity, or alleged sexual behavioral choices or preferences. Indeed, no one is ever asked their alleged sexual behavioral choices or preferences when applying for a Florida Marriage license.

FORUM NON CONVENIENS

You should also involuntarily dismiss the present lawsuit under the doctrine of forum non conveniens as a Leon County, Florida Federal court is already hearing a similar lawsuit with identical aims. If, as Plaintiffs claim, theirs is a so-called “right” under the U.S. Constitution, are not the Federal courts the most convenient forum to litigate this issue?

The above legal doctrines, reasons and grounds, and others that space prevents including here, amply show that a failure to dismiss this lawsuit sua sponte, or, in the alternative, reject Plaintiffs’ demands, would inflict grave violence to the core principles of Constitutional Democracy; undermine the Rule of Law, and constitute an incredibly horrific travesty of justice. It may also violate the Code of Judicial Conduct.

As a law-abiding judge, shouldn’t you be deeply offended at being so brazenly asked, as this lawsuit does, to discriminate and deny all your fellow citizens their constitutional liberties and civil rights?

As a judge and public servant, you took an Oath of Office to uphold and protect the U.S. and Florida Constitutions. The Code of Judicial Conduct also requires you do so. Would you not want to be remembered for upholding that oath, honoring the Judicial Conduct Code, as well as being on the right side history and the law? We certainly hope you will due to a very simple-to-understand universal law: Ruling unconstitutional the Constitution and laws that are the source of your authority automatically deprives you of your own authority to rule.

Respectfully yours,
COALITION ORGANIZATIONS,

Honorable Florida State Representative Daphne Campbell
Honorable Florida State Representative Eduardo “Eddy” Gonzalez, Chairman, Miami-Dade Delegation
African American Council of Christian Clergy (AACC)
American-Israeli Friendship Council (AIFC)
Asociacion De Ministeros Y Obreros Evangelicos (AMOE)
Catholic Council of South Florida (CCSF)
Catholic Cultural Fund (CCF)
Christian Family Coalition Florida (CFCF)
Churches of Miami Baptist Association (CMBA)
Communities Strengthening Families for the Good Life (CSFGL)
Cuban-American Patriots and Friends (CAPF)
Cuban American Publishers Association (CAPA)
Florida Democratic League (FDL)
Florida Family Association (FFA)
Mission Miami (MM)
People United Leading The Struggle For Equality (PULSE)
Republican National Forum (RNF)
Una Voce Miami (UVM)
U.S. Hispanic Publishers Federation (USHPF)

FDL STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF INNOCENT HUMAN LIFE

JOIN THE MOVEMENT TO ENSURE A BIG TENT!
Support Respect and Tolerance within the Democratic Party

Bebe 01

Not all Democrats agree that the crime of abortion should be undemocratically forced upon our nation, our families, and our children, yet incredibly the National Democratic Platform and the platforms in many states ignore this glaring reality. Pro-Life Democrats should not be made to suffer bigotry, discrimination and second-class citizen status within a Party whose leaders claim is a “Big Tent”! Our Party’s leaders must practice what they preach, or step aside. It’s as simple as that!

The Florida Democratic League (FDL) fully supports language on this issue that respects and represents all Democrats, not just a few. How can you help? Here are 3 simple ways.

1.) Contact your local Party and tell them you support the respectful, non-discriminatory language listed below.

2.) Ask 10 friends to contact their local Party.

3.) Make a contribution to FDL (see our address below) so we can continue to work towards adoption of respectful, non-discriminatory language.

Proposed Platform Language to Unite Democrats Around Historic Democratic Principles

“We respect the conscience of each American and recognize that members of our Party have deeply held and sometimes differing positions on issues of personal conscience, such as abortion and the death penalty. We recognize the diversity of views as a source of strength, and we welcome into our ranks all Americans who may hold differing positions on these and other issues.

However, we can find common ground. We believe that we can reduce the number of abortions because we are united in our support for policies that assist families who find themselves in crisis or unplanned pregnancies. We believe that women deserve to have a breadth of options available as they face pregnancy including, among others, support and resources needed to handle the challenges of pregnancy, adoption, and parenthood; access to education, healthcare, and childcare; and appropriate child support. We envision a new day without financial or societal barriers to bringing a planned or unplanned pregnancy to term.”


For interviews, comments, or to belong, please contact us at:
FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
POB 350751 / Jose Marti Station / Miami, FL 33135
DemocraticLeague@aol.com

Meet Us on the Internet
floridademocraticleague.wordpress.com

Like the FDL on Facebook
www.facebook.com/floridademocraticleague

Copyright © 2014 FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE, Inc.

FDL STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION OF ANTI-VOTER RIGHTS SHAM LAWSUIT FILED IN MIAMI-DADE CIRCUIT COURT

STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION OF ANTI-VOTER RIGHTS
SHAM LAWSUIT FILED IN MIAMI-DADE CIRCUIT COURT

Layout 1

(Adopted in Miami, Florida on February 13, 2014.)

This past January 21st, 2014, a discriminatory, sham lawsuit was filed in Miami-Dade Circuit Court attacking the dignity, equality, and voter rights of Florida citizens. The lawsuit purports to be about the fiction of homosexual so-called “marriage.” The reality is that it attacks, tramples, and disrespects the very rules of decency and democracy! The very notion of equality under the law! The very values that all of us, whether Republicans or Democrats, hold dear!

This discriminatory, sham lawsuit threatens each and every voter in Florida with the ugly stigma of discrimination, inequality and second class citizenship. It threatens each and every voter in Florida with the specter of having the historic 2008 elections overturned; of having their Will unlawfully overruled and their vote trashed by extremists attacking the every core of democracy and civil rights in America.

A BRAZEN ASSAULT ON DEMOCRACY

This sham lawsuit is a brazen assault against the core principles of the Democratic Party; the core principle of one citizen, one vote; the core of principles of equality under the law and civil rights. In a word, it soils everything that Rev. Martin Luther King and the brave freedom riders throughout the South fought for.

In November 2008, millions of Floridians voted in a historic election that elected Barack Obama president and ordained that Florida’s Constitution honor the revered institution of Marriage as the union of one man, one woman. No fair-minded citizen can support a judge nullify the historic 2008 Constitutional vote on Marriage any more than they can support a judge nullify the historic 2008 election of President Barack Obama.

Indeed, regardless of how anyone feels about the institution of Marriage or any other public policy issue, no one has the right to have a judge deny or violate everyone else’s civil rights, everyone else’s votes, or everyone else’s dignity and equality under the law.

DISMISSAL OF SHAM LAWSUIT IS A MUST

As Democrats true to the principles of our Party, we demand the immediate dismissal by Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Sarah Zabel of this outrageous and discriminatory sham lawsuit. Indeed, this lawsuit offends and disrespects Judge Zabel’s own dignity and integrity as a member of the judiciary.

People in other states may be bullied or intimidated; but NOT the people of Florida, nor the Florida Democratic League, nor our state’s other civil rights and social justice advocacy organizations and leaders. Corruption or oppression elsewhere; the denial or violation of civil rights elsewhere, can never justify corruption or oppression anywhere.

WE WILL NOT BE RETURNED TO THE DARK DAYS OF SLAVERY

The dignity, the equality, the votes, and the constitutional rights of Florida voters are NOT negotiable! Extremists must not be allowed to return us to the dark days of slavery and segregation when our equality, our rights, and our votes were brazenly denied, violated and nullified behind Courthouse doors.

Therefore, the FDL formally declares that we will defend to the end the dignity, the equality, and the voter rights of all Floridians, including those of the extremist Plaintiffs in this incendiary, sham lawsuit! We will not tolerate the denial or violation of voter rights in the Sunshine State. All Floridians are united in courageously saying: NO to Voter Rape!


For interviews, comments, or to belong, please contact us at:
FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
POB 350751 / Jose Marti Station / Miami, FL 33135
DemocraticLeague@aol.com

Meet Us on the Internet
floridademocraticleague.wordpress.com

Like the FDL on Facebook
www.facebook.com/floridademocraticleague

Copyright © 2014 FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE, Inc.

FDL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF TRUE MARRIAGE EQUALITY

FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF TRUE MARRIAGE EQUALITY

Real Marriage is between one man and one woman.

(Adopted in Miami, Florida on November 7, 2008)

As our state’s largest minority-led Democratic voters’ human and civil rights organization, the Florida Democratic League is a battle-proven champion in the fight for Voter Rights, Democracy, and true Marriage Equality. Voter rights are the cornerstone of our democracy. They are the foundation upon which all of our civil liberties rest. Marriage is one of the basic civil rights of man. It is fundamental to society’s very existence and survival. Democracy is our guarantee of peace, justice, and social order.

For a judge to nullify a democratic election and deny citizens the right to have their votes respected is to attack the fundamental freedoms that define who we are as a nation. A judge’s repudiation through re-definition of the institution of Marriage as ordained by the people is odious to a free society whose institutions are founded upon respect for popular sovereignty.

Corrupt, outlaw judges have overthrown the Constitution, undermined democratic rule, and denied our voter rights; all to impose on us what they claim is a so-called “right” to homosexual “marriage.” They cleverly call this scam “Marriage Equality.” But Marriage Equality does not equal the fiction of homosexual so-called “marriage.” True Marriage Equality equals affording everyone the same, equal right to marry under the same, equal rules.

Florida’s Constitution already prohibits discrimination and guarantees all Floridians true Marriage Equality, based on the same, equal right to marry another person under the same, equal terms and conditions. When exercising this right, no one’s alleged sexual behavioral choices are ever considered. Indeed, no one is asked their alleged sexual behavioral choices or preferences when applying for a Marriage license in the Sunshine State. The reason is clear: Florida’s Constitution and laws do not ban or prohibit anyone from marrying as husband and wife provided they are of age, unmarried, and not blood related.

On the other hand, the fiction of homosexual so-called “marriage” is discriminatory, undemocratic, and anti-Equality for many reasons. Here are just a few.

FIRST: How can homosexual so-called “marriage” have anything to do with Marriage Equality when two males or two females do not equal one male and one female? Equality is treating equal what is equal, not treating equal what is different. Treating equal what is different is never equality; it’s discrimination, it’s anti-equality. So why is discrimination and anti-equality being forced on us under the guise of “equality”?

SECOND: Upholding Marriage as the union of husband and wife, of age, unmarried and not blood-related is not even remotely similar to denying people the right to marry because of race. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled race, unlike alleged sexual behavioral choices or preferences, is a suspect class worthy of special protection. What is rational or pro-equality about claiming that race, an unquestionably immutable physical characteristic, even remotely equals alleged sexual behavioral choices or preferences? Why is the fraudulent race “argument” being so brazenly used to trick and mislead the public?

THIRD: Not being a constitutional right, as the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in Baker v. Nelson and US v. Windsor, can a judge deny the people of Florida the right to settle the public policy issue of Marriage, as they did in the historic 2008 elections, wherein they ordained Marriage as the union of husband and wife? What is democratic and pro-equality about nullifying elections and denying Floridians the right to have their votes respected? In a democracy, do judges have a license to disregard the people’s will and overturn elections whenever they dislike the outcome?

FOURTH: Regardless of how anyone feels about Marriage or any other public policy issue, does anyone have the right to demand that everyone else’s civil rights, everyone else’s votes, and everyone else’s equality and dignity under the law be violated? In a democracy, does a judge get to deny citizens their right to decide public policy issues whenever the judge disagrees with how they voted? Is this not contemptuous of democratic government; the Rule of Law, and all notions of fairness and Equality?

FIFTH: In a nation of laws, should we allow any individual or group to be above the law? In a land of equality is any individual or group more equal than others? What is fair or equal about a judge arbitrarily, unilaterally, and capriciously declaring a behavioral choice, whether sexual or otherwise, a constitutional “right,” and then forcing everyone else to accept it as such? What could be more contemptuous of Democracy; more disrespectful of the Rule of Law, or more anti-Equality?

SIXTH: Forcing on society the fiction of homosexual so-called “marriage” is not about equality, it’s about insanity. What rational person honestly thinks that social peace and tolerance are ever achieved through legal sleights of hand, judicial voter lynchings, or overthrowing democratic rule? Did not millions upon millions of fair-minded Floridians of all different colors, sexes, ethnic backgrounds, races, political parties and creeds vote YES in the historic 2008 elections ordaining the institution of Marriage as the union of husband and wife? Will that election; everyone’s votes, and everyone’s civil rights be respected and upheld? Will the core principles of democratic government remain legally protected or be judicially gunned down?

For any judge, years after an election, to overturn its results and deny Floridians their basic voter rights, is nothing short of treason to the Constitution and the very values and ideals for which so many Americans have fought, shed their blood and sacrificed their life since our nation’s founding.

We urge all civic-minded Floridians to stand up for Voter Rights, Democracy. and true Marriage Equality, and reject the blatant lies and treasonous judicial assaults on Democracy and the Rule of Law from extremists pushing a phony, so-called “equality” that violates the dignity, civil rights, and equality of all Floridians, including themselves!


About the FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE (FDL)
Founded in 1991, the Florida Democratic League (FDL) is one of the state’s leading Hispanic-led civil rights and social justice advocacy organizations. Our grassroots campaigns have effectively raised issues of importance to all Floridians, but especially minorities. FDL is worlds ahead in its local and statewide engagement, finding solutions to the most challenging problems of our time. FDL’s mission is to reaffirm respect for innocent human life, promote social justice and human development, preserve freedom through the Rule of Law, and inspire an end to hatred, ignorance and intolerance.


For interviews, comments, or to belong, please contact us at:
FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE
POB 350751 / Jose Marti Station / Miami, FL 33135
DemocraticLeague@aol.com

Meet Us on the Internet
https://floridademocraticleague.wordpress.com

Like the FDL on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/floridademocraticleague

Copyright © 2014 FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC LEAGUE, Inc.